Skip to main content

Industrial Environmental Management Systems

BayBiotech.NET
Environmental Management Systems (EMS) can be considered as a tool to manage the environmental quality policies and procedures as per Industry standards and regulatory guidelines. EMS provides a framework to efficiently operate organizational responsibilities and activities in most efficient ways keeping the risk to the environment at its minimum. EMS also provides scope to the organization to implement corrective and preventive plan in order to continuously improve the environmental performance. An effective management system ensures that adequate efforts are properly deployed in regard to training, monitoring and reporting.

Three main environmental guidelines that fall within the scope of Biotech/ Life Sciences Industry and will need integration with EMS are:

RC14001: Responsible Care® (RC) is a voluntary initiative of the worldwide chemical industry with a focus on an on-going efforts to improve the safety and the protection of health and the environment, applicable not only to the organization but to the entire supply chain. The program was first introduced in 1988 by the American Chemistry Council (ACC) to address public concerns about the manufacture and use of chemicals and so far has been adopted in over 45 countries. To further strengthen the program,
ACC integrated the Responsible Care® requirements into the globally accepted Environmental Management Standard, ISO 14001.Responsible Care® principles in some form or other have been long adopted by leading organizations in the chemical industry. (http://www.techstreet.com/)
OHSAS18001: OHSAS 18001 standards were created by concerted efforts of the world’s leading national standards bodies, certification bodies, and specialists for occupational health and safety standards. The OHSAS specification is applicable to any organization that wishes to establish an OH&S management system to eliminate or minimize risk to employees and other interested parties who may be exposed to OH&S risks associated with its activities and provides guidelines to implement maintain and improve an OH&S management system.( http://www.osha-bs8800-ohsas-18001-health-and-safety.com/ohsas-18001.htm)
ISO14001: The ISO 14000 family addresses various aspects of environmental management. The very first two standards, ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 14004:2004 deal with environmental management systems (EMS). ISO 14001:2004 provides the requirements for an EMS and ISO 14004:2004 gives general EMS guidelines.
 ISO 14001:2004 provides a generic requirement for an environmental management system. The underlying philosophy is that whatever the organization's activity, the requirements of an effective EMS are the same, whereas:
 ISO 14004:2004 provides guidelines on the elements of an environmental management system and its implementation, and discusses principal issues involved. (http://www.iso.org/)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harmonization by Doing (HBD): Japan & U.S. Collaboration

BayBiotech.NET HBD is an international cooperative effort by Japan and US for regulatory convergence for Medical Devices. The efforts are focused on to develop global clinical trials and address regulatory barriers for timely device approvals. To address the needs for additional evaluation, the HBD initiative is a pilot project launched jointly by FDA and MHLW-PMDA for the premarket review of device cardiovascular technology. Instead of taking a theoretical approach to harmonization, HBD is focused on Proof of concept by utilizing parallel development, application submissions and review of actual medical device projects. HBD Study intends to collect and analyze regulatory submission data from multiple applications in the U.S. and Japan. The purpose of the study is to further understand differences that may exist with format and content, to define best practices and to improve globally harmonized processes. To read more about the HBD program, follow the link: http://www.fda.gov/M...

Amendments for High Risk Device Type Regulatory Pathway

BayBiotech.NET Government Accounting Office (“GAO”) has issued a long-awaited report evaluating the use of the 510(k) process by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA” or the “Agency”) in the January of 2009. Report mainly focused on Preamendment class III devices. Although most high-risk class III medical devices are subject to the demanding premarket approval (“PMA”) process, preamendment class III devices may be cleared through the 510(k) pathway until FDA issues regulations requiring a PMA. Under the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, FDA was required either to reclassify preamendment class III devices into class I or II, or (2) issue regulations requiring PMA approval for the devices, GAO noted that 20 preamendment class III device types have not yet been addressed by the Agency. GAO has urged FDA to take required steps to address the remaining class III devices that continue to be eligible for 510(k) review. As a result of the report, FDA has committed to address al...

Risk Based Clinical Monitoring

BayBiotech.NET FDA's recommendation of Risk Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials , as published in their Draft Guidance in August 2011. For the first time, FDA provided guidance on monitoring of clinical investigations in 1988 which was recently withdrawn, stated that the “most effective way” to monitor an investigation was to “maintain personal contact between the monitor and the investigator throughout the clinical investigation.” At the time the guidance was issued, sponsors had only limited ways to effect meaningful communication with investigators other than through on-site visits.   This guidance recommends an assessment by the sponsor for the need of 100% on-site monitoring. Such an assessment may be based on the complexity of the study protocol and not be generally applicable to all trial types. It explains the importance of remote monitoring facilitated by the use of electronic data capture system (EDC) and also emphasizes the need of the identifying crit...