Skip to main content

Posts

Risk Assesment and Management of Electronic Health Information

BayBiotech.NET Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA, Title II) required the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish national standards for the security of electronic health care information. Department of Health and Human Services prepared certain guidelines that specify a series of administrative, technical, and physical security procedures for covered entities to use to assure the confidentiality of electronic protected health information (EPHI). This is particularly relevant for organizations that allow remote access to EPHI through portable devices or on external systems or hardware not owned or managed by the covered entity. Guidelines address mainly the privacy of health information issues that may arise by using laptops; home-based personal computers; PDAs and Smart Phones; hotel, library or other public workstations and Wireless Access Points (WAPs); USB Flash Drives and Memory Cards; floppy disks; CDs; DVDs; backup media; E

European Union Safe Harbor Policy

BayBiotech.NET The European Commission’s Directive on Data Protection w.e.f.October of 1998 prohibits the transfer of personal data to non-European Union nations that do not meet the European “adequacy” standard for privacy protection of the personal data. For purposes of the policy, "personal information" means information that:  is transferred from the European Union to the United States;  is recorded in any form;  is about, or pertains to, a specific individual or can be linked to that individual. While both the United States and the European Union share the goal of enhancing privacy protection for their citizens, the United States takes a different approach to privacy from that taken by the European Union. With a goal to bridge the different privacy approaches between the United States and European Union and provide a streamlined means for U.S. organizations to comply with the Directive, the U.S. Department of Commerce in consultation with the European Commissi

FDA's Critical Path Initiative

BayBiotech.NET FDA launched its Critical Path Initiative (CPI) in March 2004, with the release of a report “Innovation/Stagnation: Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products”. This report highlights the reasons for the widening gap between modern scientific discoveries with a potential to prevent and cure some of today's biggest medical challenges, and their translation into innovative medical treatments. The main reason identified was being Industry’s apprehension to adapt and train to new technologies that might delay launch of the product into the consumer market. In order to ease out the apprehension, FDA recognized the need for a collective action to modernize the scientific and technical tools and introduced CPI and calls for incorporating specific activities into the medical development path that would help modernize the critical path sciences. CPI has seen the number of its projects grow from 40 in 2006 to 95 in 2009. FDA is collaborating wi

Clinical Trial Risk Assessment & Management Plan

BayBiotech.NET Before the onset of a trial the study director/sponsor must have a risk assessment and risk management plan to accompany the filing to IRB or FDA for IND or PMA applications. Hazard is defined as anything that could cause harm and risk is the probability of that harm caused by the hazard. Risk Assessment Plan for each potential hazard includes mapping and analysis of associated risks, its potential consequences and reasonable steps to reduce the risks. In a clinical trial hazards are categorized into main four groups: 1.     Hazards for the participants that encompasses protecting participant’s rights. 2.     Hazards for the participant’s safety by assessing the likely risk/ benefit ratio in the study population. 3.     Hazards of the trial with risk associated for recruitment and follow-up. 4.     Hazard to the reliability of the results mainly in terms of study power and adherence to the protocol. Risk Management Plan includes detailed strategies and

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Guidance for Pharmaceutics and Biologics

BayBiotech.NET FDA has posted draft guidance for Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments, and Proposed REMS Modifications on its website. The draft guidance has been posted in September 2009 and is open for comments and feedbacks from all that may have an interest in the subject. In a nutshell, the guidance authorizes FDA to require the applicants of NDA (new drug applications), ANDAs (abbreviated new drug applications), and biologics license applications (BLAs) to submit a proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) within 180 days once notified by FDA and may come to the applicant, if FDA becomes aware that such a strategy might be necessary to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh the risks of the drug in question. Before September 2007, when the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) was signed, FDA used to approve a small number of drug and biological products with risk minimization a