Skip to main content

Orphan Drug Designation

BayBiotech.NET

Orphan Drug is a special status designated to a drug or biologics to treat a rare disease or condition. In order to obtain this designation, drug or biologics must meet certain criteria.

Orphan designation qualifies the sponsor for the tax credit and marketing incentives as per Orphan Drug Act. In addition, orphan drug is not subject to a prescription drug user fee unless used for other indications.

For application purposes, sponsor shall submit two copies of a completed, dated, and signed request for designation that contains the following:

(1) A statement that the sponsor requests orphan drug designation for a rare disease or condition.

(2) The name and address of the sponsor; the name of the sponsor's primary contact person.

(3) A description of the rare disease or condition for which the drug will be investigated.

(4) A scientific rationale for the use of the drug for the rare disease or condition.

(5) Where the sponsor of an already approved orphan drug seeks orphan drug designation for the subsequent drug for the same rare disease or condition, an explanation of why the proposed variation may be clinically superior to the first drug.

(6) If a drug is under development for only a subset of persons with a particular disease or condition, a justification that the subset is medically plausible.

(7) A summary of the regulatory status and marketing history of the drug in the United States and in foreign countries.

Application must have supportive documents to demonstrate that the disease or condition for which the drug is intended affects fewer than 200,000 people.
More information about Orphan Drug Status and tips for application can be found at:
Designating an Orphan Product: Drugs and Biologics, http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/HowtoapplyforOrphanProductDesignation/default.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ISO Management Standards for Medical Devices

Two main ISO standards that have a direct application to Medical Device Industry are ISO 9001 and ISO 13485. While ISO 9001 is for evolving a Quality Management System for an organization, ISO 13485 has a direct application to Medical Device Industry. Although, ISO standards for a company are not a legal requirement, but provide a validation and ease of global marketing of the product.

FDA Launches Medical Device and Radiation-Emitting Product Transparency Web Site

BayBiotech.NET On April 19th, 2010 FDA launched he Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Transparency Web site in support of the agency’s Transparency Initiative. The Web site makes available new information about CDRH’s decision-making processes and displays this information in a more user-friendly format. The site includes new information such as basic information about medical devices and how FDA regulates those products, information about medical devices before and after the products are on the market, in a searchable database, information about the clinical studies and trials conducted to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of certain medical devices, memos from FDA employees explaining the reasons for the agency's decisions about medical device manufacturer requests to make a significant change in components, materials, design, specification, software, color additive, and labeling of a medical device as well as a step-by-step guide for manufacturers of

Risk Based Clinical Monitoring

BayBiotech.NET FDA's recommendation of Risk Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials , as published in their Draft Guidance in August 2011. For the first time, FDA provided guidance on monitoring of clinical investigations in 1988 which was recently withdrawn, stated that the “most effective way” to monitor an investigation was to “maintain personal contact between the monitor and the investigator throughout the clinical investigation.” At the time the guidance was issued, sponsors had only limited ways to effect meaningful communication with investigators other than through on-site visits.   This guidance recommends an assessment by the sponsor for the need of 100% on-site monitoring. Such an assessment may be based on the complexity of the study protocol and not be generally applicable to all trial types. It explains the importance of remote monitoring facilitated by the use of electronic data capture system (EDC) and also emphasizes the need of the identifying critical