Skip to main content

European Union’s Clinical Trials Directive

BayBiotech.NET
Following is a summary of the key points on the laws, regulations and Good Clinical Practices of the Member States as per European Union’s Directive for conduct of Clinical Trials on human subjects:

1. Directive requires that applications for authorization to place a medicinal product on the market should be accompanied by a dossier containing particulars and documents relating to the results of tests and clinical trials carried out on the product. A dossier must be prepared in compliance with uniform rules laid down by the Member States.

2. A detailed risk assessment and management strategy must be in place based on the toxicological data derived at Pre-clinical research stage.

3. Persons who are incapable of giving legal consent such as dementia, psychiatric patients etc. to clinical trials should be given special protection. Such persons may not be included in clinical trials if the same results can be obtained using persons capable of giving consent. These persons should be included in clinical trials only when there are grounds for expecting that the administering of the medicinal product would be of direct benefit to the patient. However, if possible clinical trials must involve children in order to evolve better treatments for them.

4. In order to achieve optimum protection of health, obsolete or repetitive tests will not be carried out, whether within the Community or in third countries. Such initiatives must be conducted through the International Conference on Harmonization.

5. For Medicinal Products intended for gene therapy or cell therapy, prior scientific evaluation by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products assisted by the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products, is mandatory before the Commission grants marketing authorization.

6. Information on the content, commencement and termination of a clinical trial should be available to the Member State where the trial takes place and all the other Member States should have access to the same information.

7. As a rule, if there has been a vote in favor by the Ethics Committee and the competent authority has not objected within a given period, it should be possible to begin the clinical trials. In exceptional cases especially for complex problems/ treatments, explicit written authorization should be obtained.

8. The principles of good manufacturing practice should be applied to investigational medicinal products and for the labeling of these products.

9. The person participating in a trial must consent to the scrutiny of personal information during inspection by competent authorities and properly authorized persons, provided that such personal information is treated as strictly confidential and is not made publicly available.


10. It is also necessary to make provision for the monitoring of adverse reactions occurring in clinical trials using Community surveillance (pharmacovigilance) procedures.


Thus, this provides a snapshot of the key elements of EU’s Clinical Trials Directive. The information provided here is extracted from Official Journal of the European Communities (1.5.2001): L 121/34- 44.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Launches Medical Device and Radiation-Emitting Product Transparency Web Site

BayBiotech.NET On April 19th, 2010 FDA launched he Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Transparency Web site in support of the agency’s Transparency Initiative. The Web site makes available new information about CDRH’s decision-making processes and displays this information in a more user-friendly format. The site includes new information such as basic information about medical devices and how FDA regulates those products, information about medical devices before and after the products are on the market, in a searchable database, information about the clinical studies and trials conducted to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of certain medical devices, memos from FDA employees explaining the reasons for the agency's decisions about medical device manufacturer requests to make a significant change in components, materials, design, specification, software, color additive, and labeling of a medical device as well as a step-by-step guide for manufacturers of...

eCTD Submission Specifications

BayBiotech.NET The electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) is an interface for the pharmaceutical industry to agency transfer of regulatory information. eCTD technical document format development was done by International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Multidisciplinary Group 2 Expert Working Group (ICH M2 EWG). Details on the specification for the ICH eCTD can be found in the guidance document M2 eCTD: Electronic Common Technical Document Specification. Currently, eCTD is the preferred format for electronic submissions by U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Although originally the CTD and the eCTD were designed for marketing applications, they could apply equally to other submission types, including INDs, master files, advertising material, and promotional labeling. In June 2008, FDA has issued guidelines for organizing the electronic regulatory document filing using the eCTD tools. This guidance discusses issues related to the electronic submission of applications for hum...

Harmonization by Doing (HBD): Japan & U.S. Collaboration

BayBiotech.NET HBD is an international cooperative effort by Japan and US for regulatory convergence for Medical Devices. The efforts are focused on to develop global clinical trials and address regulatory barriers for timely device approvals. To address the needs for additional evaluation, the HBD initiative is a pilot project launched jointly by FDA and MHLW-PMDA for the premarket review of device cardiovascular technology. Instead of taking a theoretical approach to harmonization, HBD is focused on Proof of concept by utilizing parallel development, application submissions and review of actual medical device projects. HBD Study intends to collect and analyze regulatory submission data from multiple applications in the U.S. and Japan. The purpose of the study is to further understand differences that may exist with format and content, to define best practices and to improve globally harmonized processes. To read more about the HBD program, follow the link: http://www.fda.gov/M...