Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and much more.....

BayBiotech.NET
This blog is focused on discussing some of the terminology you may come across while dealing with Quality Control/Assurance or regulatory compliance in a Pharmaceutical/ Life sciences Industry environment.
We may not dedicate many blogs on this, but briefly going over them, will provide us the acquaintance with theses terms and may help understand them better whenever they are referenced in other documents/ blogs. These are as follows:

Pharmaceutics: discipline of pharmacology that involves evaluation, design and preparation of suitable dosage forms of chemical entities and delivery systems. This discipline is targeted towards optimizing drug action as well as minimizing adverse effects. Pharmaceutics involves studies from interdependent areas such as physical chemistry, biochemistry, analytical chemistry, mathematics, chemical engineering, molecular and cellular biology, pharmacology, anatomy and physiology.

Pharmacokinetics: is the study of the time course of drug in different fluids, tissues, and excreta of the body (effect of body on the drug).

ADME (T): is a term used for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicology studies.

Pharmacodynamics: study of the physiological effects of ingested drugs within or on the body. (effect of drug on the body).

Pharmacogenomics: study of how an individual's genetic constitution affects body's response to drugs.

Pharmaceutical Formulation: process in which different substances, including the active drug, are combined to produce a final medicinal product.

Biologics: studying a wide range of medicinal products of biological origin. Examples are vaccines, blood and blood components, allergenic, somatic cells, gene therapy, tissues, and recombinant therapeutic proteins. In most of the jurisdictions worldwide, biologics are regulated in a different manner than are drugs and medical devices.

Bioequivalence: United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has defined bioequivalence as the absence of a significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety in pharmaceutical equivalents or pharmaceutical alternatives becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions in an appropriately designed study. These studies are mainly conducted to compare two products such as a commercially-available Brand product and a potential to-be-marketed Generic product.

Bioavailability: is the fraction of the administered dose that reaches the systemic circulation.

Potency and Efficacy: Potency refers to the amount of drug (usually expressed in milligrams) needed to produce an effect. Efficacy refers to the potential maximum therapeutic response that a drug can produce.

Dose Response: measured as LD50 or statistically-derived dose that is lethal to 50% of a modeled population.

Pharmacovigilance: is the science of collecting, monitoring, researching, assessing and evaluating information from healthcare providers and patients on the adverse effects of medications.

References:

1. Gibaldi, M. and Perrier, D. 1975 Pharmacokinetics, Marcel Dekker, page v.
2. J. Lazarou, B. H. Pomeranz, and P. N. Corey. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. Apr 15, 1998. 279(15):1200-5.
3. J. Hodgson, and A. Marshall. Pharmacogenomics: will the regulators approve? Nature Biotechnolgy. 16: 243-246. 1998.
4. S. Pistoi. Facing your genetic destiny, part II. Scientific American. February 25, 2002.
5. Genomics.energy.gov
6. Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)
7. accelrys.com
8. http://www.fas.org/ota/reports/7401.pdf
9. http://aquaticpath.umd.edu/appliedtox/dose-response.pdf
10. www.fda.gov

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Amendments for High Risk Device Type Regulatory Pathway

BayBiotech.NET Government Accounting Office (“GAO”) has issued a long-awaited report evaluating the use of the 510(k) process by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA” or the “Agency”) in the January of 2009. Report mainly focused on Preamendment class III devices. Although most high-risk class III medical devices are subject to the demanding premarket approval (“PMA”) process, preamendment class III devices may be cleared through the 510(k) pathway until FDA issues regulations requiring a PMA. Under the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, FDA was required either to reclassify preamendment class III devices into class I or II, or (2) issue regulations requiring PMA approval for the devices, GAO noted that 20 preamendment class III device types have not yet been addressed by the Agency. GAO has urged FDA to take required steps to address the remaining class III devices that continue to be eligible for 510(k) review. As a result of the report, FDA has committed to address al...
Post a Comment
Read more

What to include in Traditional 510(k) Filing for Medical Devices

BayBiotech.NET A 510k is a premarket submission made to FDA to demonstrate that a medical device to be marketed is at least as safe and effective, that is, substantially equivalent, to a legally marketed device. A Traditional 510(k) submission must include the required elements as per 21 CFR 807.87 (Information required in a premarket notification submission):  the name of device, (the trade or proprietary name), if any, and the common or usual name or classification name of the device.  description of the device, include device specifications and reference applicable guidance documents, special controls, or standards; photographs or engineering drawings should be supplied, if applicable.  comparison with a predicate device(s), indicating similarities and/or differences accompanied by data, as appropriate; this information may include an identification of materials, design considerations, energy expected to be used or delivered by the device, and a description of the operatio...
Post a Comment
Read more

Harmonization by Doing (HBD): Japan & U.S. Collaboration

BayBiotech.NET HBD is an international cooperative effort by Japan and US for regulatory convergence for Medical Devices. The efforts are focused on to develop global clinical trials and address regulatory barriers for timely device approvals. To address the needs for additional evaluation, the HBD initiative is a pilot project launched jointly by FDA and MHLW-PMDA for the premarket review of device cardiovascular technology. Instead of taking a theoretical approach to harmonization, HBD is focused on Proof of concept by utilizing parallel development, application submissions and review of actual medical device projects. HBD Study intends to collect and analyze regulatory submission data from multiple applications in the U.S. and Japan. The purpose of the study is to further understand differences that may exist with format and content, to define best practices and to improve globally harmonized processes. To read more about the HBD program, follow the link: http://www.fda.gov/M...
Post a Comment
Read more